38 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
38 lines
1.7 KiB
Markdown
# Fuzz-testing of various parsers and mocked examples
|
|
|
|
A secure web server must be capable of receiving mass amount of malicious input without misbehaving or performing illegal actions, such as stepping outside of a memory block or otherwise spilling the beans.
|
|
|
|
### Continuous fuzzing under various sanitizers is done as part of the [Google OSS-Fuzz](https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz#oss-fuzz---continuous-fuzzing-for-open-source-software) project:
|
|
* UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer
|
|
* AddressSanitizer
|
|
* MemorySanitizer
|
|
|
|
### Currently the following parts are individually fuzzed:
|
|
|
|
* WebSocket handshake generator
|
|
* WebSocket message parser
|
|
* WebSocket extensions parser & negotiator
|
|
* WebSocket permessage-deflate compression/inflation helper
|
|
* Http parser
|
|
* Http method/url router
|
|
* Pub/sub "topic tree"
|
|
|
|
### While entire (mocked) examples are fuzzed:
|
|
|
|
* HelloWorld
|
|
* EchoServer
|
|
* BroadcastingEchoServer
|
|
|
|
### Fuzzing at the syscall level is done using libEpollFuzzer for:
|
|
|
|
* EchoServer
|
|
|
|
No defects or issues are left unfixed, covered up or otherwise neglected. In fact we **cannot** cover up security issues as OSS-Fuzz automatically and publicly reports security issues as they happen.
|
|
|
|
Here is the list of public issues (issues are kept private for 90 days or until fixed): https://bugs.chromium.org/p/oss-fuzz/issues/list?q=label%3AProj-uwebsockets&can=1
|
|
|
|
Currently we are at **99.5%** function coverage, **~90%** line coverage and OSS-Fuzz is reporting **zero** issues in our codebase whatsoever. The goal is to approach 100% total coverage.
|
|
|
|
### Security rewards
|
|
Google have sent us thousands of USD for the integration with OSS-Fuzz - we continue working on bettering the testing with every new release.
|