The rules are way simpler than so

This commit is contained in:
Alex Hultman
2022-10-22 23:35:58 +02:00
parent d18deb8fe3
commit 05523997db
2 changed files with 34 additions and 22 deletions
+1 -1
View File
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ int main() {
if (isFin && !*isAborted) {
std::stringstream s;
s << std::hex << crc;
s << std::hex << crc << std::endl;
res->end(s.str());
}
});
+33 -21
View File
@@ -246,17 +246,6 @@ private:
/* We ran out of header space, too large request */
return 0;
}
/* Doing a deep scan to determine in a standards-compliant way whether this request is chunked or not.
* This is going to be the place where obfuscated transfer-encoding shananigans are found. */
bool isChunkedBody(std::string_view transferEncodingString, HttpRequest */*req*/) {
return transferEncodingString.find("chunked") != std::string_view::npos;
/*for (HttpRequest::Header *h = req->headers; (++h)->key.length(); ) {
}*/
}
// the only caller of getHeaders
template <int CONSUME_MINIMALLY>
@@ -300,9 +289,39 @@ private:
return {consumedTotal, returnedUser};
}
/* Highest priority is always transfer-encoding: chunked */
/* The rules at play here according to RFC 9112 for requests are essentially:
* If both content-length and transfer-encoding then invalid message; must break.
* If has transfer-encoding then must be chunked regardless of value.
* If content-length then fixed length even if 0.
* If none of the above then fixed length is 0. */
/* RFC 9112 6.3
* If a message is received with both a Transfer-Encoding and a Content-Length header field,
* the Transfer-Encoding overrides the Content-Length. */
std::string_view transferEncodingString = req->getHeader("transfer-encoding");
if (transferEncodingString.length() && isChunkedBody(transferEncodingString, req)) {
std::string_view contentLengthString = req->getHeader("content-length");
if (transferEncodingString.length()) {
/* If a proxy sent us the transfer-encoding header that 100% means it must be chunked or else the proxy is
* not RFC 9112 compliant. Therefore it is always better to assume this is the case, since that entirely eliminates
* all forms of transfer-encoding obfuscation tricks. We just rely on the header. */
/* RFC 9112 6.3
* [...] Such a message might indicate an attempt to perform request smuggling
* (Section 11.2) or response splitting (Section 11.1) and ought to be handled as an error. */
if (contentLengthString.length()) {
return {0, nullptr};
}
/* RFC 9112 6.3
* If a Transfer-Encoding header field is present in a request and the chunked transfer coding is not the
* final encoding, the message body length cannot be determined reliably; the server MUST respond with the
* 400 (Bad Request) status code and then close the connection. */
/* In this case we fail later by having the wrong interpretation (assuming chunked).
* This could be made stricter but makes no difference either way, unless forwarding the identical message as a proxy. */
remainingStreamingBytes = STATE_IS_CHUNKED;
/* If consume minimally, we do not want to consume anything but we want to mark this as being chunked */
if (!CONSUME_MINIMALLY) {
@@ -316,14 +335,7 @@ private:
length = (unsigned int) dataToConsume.length();
consumedTotal += consumed;
}
/* Do not try anything else */
continue;
}
/* Second priority is content-length */
std::string_view contentLengthString = req->getHeader("content-length");
if (contentLengthString.length()) {
} else if (contentLengthString.length()) {
remainingStreamingBytes = toUnsignedInteger(contentLengthString);
if (!CONSUME_MINIMALLY) {