This enables accessing the Extensions field, as defined in the response
format: https://spec.graphql.org/October2021/#sec-Response-Format
Extensions can be enabled using configuration option use_extensions.
This will change the return parameters of the generated client
functions. Making it a breaking change if enabled.
Since extensions are untyped as defined in the spec, the Client will
return an interface of type map[string]interface{}.
`Code generated by` disclaimer should be at the top of the file, as it is demonstrated in [this article](https://go.dev/blog/generate) on The Go Blog.
The current placing breaks integration with some code formatters and linters which do no skip files generated by `genqlient`.
## Summary:
If your type implements an interface, we add getter methods for the
shared fields, so that those may be accessed via the interface. But it
turns out occasionally it's useful to have these getter methods when
they don't implement a GraphQL interface, so you can use two
genqlient-generated types in the same function if they have the same
fields. (This comes up most often when you have a GraphQL union that
maybe should really be an interface, or if you don't yet support
interfaces implementing other interfaces (indeed our parser doesn't
either). But one can imagine other use cases.)
We can't predict how you want to do that, so we can't generate the
interface, but we can generate the methods, so you can define the
interface and do a type assertion from there. Since these methods are
pretty simple to generate, we just do it always. (As with #120, if
binary size becomes an issue we could later add an option to only
generate methods that are truly needed but including them seems like the
better default.)
This also fixes a subtle and rare bug, which would have become much more
common (indeed existing tests caught it). Specifically, if you have a
query like
```graphql
fragment FragmentOne on T { id }
fragment FragmentTwo on T { id }
query Q {
f { # interface type T
...FragmentOne
...FragmentTwo
}
}
```
since both `FragmentOne` and `FragmentTwo` request some common field,
say `id`, we generate a method `GetId` on each one. But since
`FragmentOne` and `FragmentTwo` are both on `T`, we also include their
interfaces in the interface we generate for the type of `f`, `QFT`. So
`QFT` includes a method `GetId`. But on the implementations, the two
methods conflict, and neither gets promoted; this causes various code to
fail to compile. With this change, this would have happened much more
frequently -- even if only one of the two fragments is on `T`, as long
as both request the field. Anyway, we now generate explicit methods on
each struct for all of its recursively emebedded fields -- using the
logic from #120 to compute them -- so that we don't need to rely on
method-promotion.
## Test plan:
make tesc
Author: benjaminjkraft
Reviewers: csilvers, dnerdy, aberkan, jvoll, mahtabsabet, MiguelCastillo, StevenACoffman
Required Reviewers:
Approved By: csilvers, dnerdy
Checks: ✅ Test (1.17), ✅ Test (1.16), ✅ Test (1.15), ✅ Test (1.14), ✅ Lint, ✅ Test (1.17), ✅ Test (1.16), ✅ Test (1.15), ✅ Test (1.14), ✅ Lint
Pull Request URL: https://github.com/Khan/genqlient/pull/126
## Summary:
In this commit I refactor the argument-generation logic to move most of
the code out of the template and into the type-generator. This logic
predates #51, and I didn't think to update it there, but I think it
benefits from similar treatment, for similar reasons.
Specifically, the main change is to treat variables as another struct
type we can generate, rather than handling them inline as a
`map[string]interface{}`. Users still pass them the same way, but
instead of putting them into a `map[string]interface{}` and JSONifying
that, we generate a struct and put them there.
This turns out to simplify things quite a lot, because we already have a
lot of code to generate types. Notably, the omitempty code goes from a
dozen lines to basically two, and fixes a bug (#43) in the process,
because now that we have a struct, `json.Marshal` will do our work for
us! (And, once we have syntax for it (#14), we'll be able to handle
field-level omitempty basically for free.) More importantly, it will
simplify custom marshalers (#38, forthcoming) significantly, since we do
all that logic at the containing-struct level, but will need to apply it
to arguments.
It does require two breaking changes:
1. For folks implementing the `graphql.Client` API (rather than just
calling `NewClient`): we now pass them variables as an `interface{}`
rather than a `map[string]interface{}`. For most callers, including
Khan/webapp, this is basically a one-line change to the signature of
their `MakeRequest`, and it should be a lot more future-proof.
2. genqlient's handling of the `omitempty` option has changed to match
that of `encoding/json`, in particular it now never considers structs
"empty". The difference was never intentional (I just didn't realize
that behavior of `encoding/json`); arguably our behavior was more
useful but I think that's outweighed by the value of consistency with
`encoding/json` as well as the simpler and more correct
implementation (fixing #43 is actually quite nontrivial otherwise).
Once we have custom unmarshaler support (#38), users will be able to
map a zero value to JSON null if they wish, which is mostly if not
entirely equivalent for GraphQL's purposes.
Issue: https://github.com/Khan/genqlient/issues/38
Issue: https://github.com/Khan/genqlient/issues/43
## Test plan:
make check
Author: benjaminjkraft
Reviewers: StevenACoffman, dnerdy, aberkan, jvoll, mahtabsabet, MiguelCastillo
Required Reviewers:
Approved By: StevenACoffman, dnerdy
Checks: ✅ Test (1.17), ✅ Test (1.16), ✅ Test (1.15), ✅ Test (1.14), ✅ Lint, ✅ Lint, ✅ Test (1.17), ✅ Test (1.16), ✅ Test (1.15), ✅ Test (1.14)
Pull Request URL: https://github.com/Khan/genqlient/pull/103
## Summary:
I realized:
- it's simpler to avoid the usual `cmd` and just put it all in the same
directory
- we don't need schema.json since GitHub now posts a schema in SDL
format
## Test plan:
make lint example
Author: benjaminjkraft
Reviewers: dnerdy, StevenACoffman, aberkan, jvoll, mahtabsabet, MiguelCastillo
Required Reviewers:
Approved By: dnerdy, StevenACoffman
Checks: ✅ Test (1.17), ✅ Test (1.16), ✅ Test (1.15), ✅ Test (1.14), ✅ Lint, ✅ Test (1.17), ✅ Test (1.16), ✅ Test (1.15), ✅ Test (1.14), ✅ Lint
Pull Request URL: https://github.com/Khan/genqlient/pull/89
## Summary:
ContextType is in use at Khan as a part of our ka-context system; it
basically just lets you configure the type to pass as the `ctx` argument
to genqlient helpers (or say to omit such an argument). ClientGetter I
wrote thinking we might use it; then we didn't (because we have a few
different clients we may use) but it's not much code and may be helpful
to others. In this commit I clean up, document, and add tests for both
options.
The cleanup is mainly for ClientGetter, which was kind of broken before
because it was a Go snippet but couldn't specify imports. I was
thinking maybe you want to be able to write `ctx.Something()`, but I
just don't see how to make it work, so I made it a function of context,
which is probably the better idea anyway.
Additionally, I improved the documentation for both, and added tests for
those and several other config options that weren't completely tested.
Fixes#5.
Issue: https://github.com/Khan/genqlient/issues/5
## Test plan:
make check
Author: benjaminjkraft
Reviewers: dnerdy, aberkan, MiguelCastillo
Required Reviewers:
Approved By: dnerdy
Checks: ✅ Test (1.17), ✅ Test (1.16), ✅ Test (1.15), ✅ Test (1.14), ✅ Test (1.13), ✅ Lint, ✅ Test (1.17), ✅ Test (1.16), ✅ Test (1.15), ✅ Test (1.14), ✅ Test (1.13), ✅ Lint
Pull Request URL: https://github.com/Khan/genqlient/pull/77
Craig pointed out this is a bit confusing when you don't have all the
fields. Now we say so, but still include the type's description in case
it's useful.
Fixes#37.
