## Summary:
When adding support for interfaces, I did not do the type-names as I
intended: they came out to be `MyFieldMyType`, not
`MyInterfaceMyFieldMyType`, which is inconsistent, but not strictly
wrong. But once supporting fragments, this is also now incorrect.
(Exactly why is described in the comments inline.) In this commit, in
any case, I fix it.
To do that, I finally did the last of the refactors I've been hoping to
do but unable to successfully implement, which is to make the type-name
and type-name-prefix management clearer. In the past it was kind of
spread out, and each caller would have to pass the right name into
`convertDefinition`, which go quite unwieldy. Now, the case that really
wanted that -- the operation toplevel -- just does it own thing; and the
main name-generation code is factored out into a separate file with
tests, and with a long comment that goes into all the details of the
algorithm that the design-doc didn't cover. (I even had some fun using
a linked list to implement the prefix-stack!)
This allowed me to fix the above bug fairly easily -- actually the fix
was pretty much automatic once I understood how to organize things.
There is one change which is that if your query name is unexported, we
no longer do the same with the input-type names; it's unclear to me if
anyone will actually care about this behavior (Khan always makes the
queries exported) but if they did it was very inconsistent (only at the
query toplevel, and only for input-objects, not enums), so we can
reimplement it properly if that comes up. As a bonus fix, we now better
handle the case where your type-names are lowercase, which is legal if
nonstandard GraphQL.
Issue: https://github.com/Khan/genqlient/issues/8
## Test plan:
make tesc
Author: benjaminjkraft
Reviewers: dnerdy, benjaminjkraft, aberkan, MiguelCastillo
Required Reviewers:
Approved by: dnerdy
Checks: ✅ Test (1.17), ✅ Test (1.16), ✅ Test (1.15), ✅ Test (1.14), ✅ Test (1.13), ✅ Lint, ✅ Test (1.17), ✅ Test (1.16), ✅ Test (1.15), ✅ Test (1.14), ✅ Test (1.13), ✅ Lint
Pull request URL: https://github.com/Khan/genqlient/pull/71
## Summary:
Having implemented support for interfaces, it's time to implement
support for fragments. And it turns out there's actually another design
decision I hadn't really thought about when thinking about interfaces!
In this commit I add a sketch of the design -- two proposed designs
really. This one I think will be easier to change later (via a flag),
but opinions are still welcome.
Issue: https://github.com/Khan/genqlient/issues/8
## Test plan:
read it
Author: benjaminjkraft
Reviewers: dnerdy, benjaminjkraft, aberkan, csilvers, MiguelCastillo
Required Reviewers:
Approved by: dnerdy
Checks: ✅ Test (1.17), ✅ Test (1.16), ✅ Test (1.15), ✅ Test (1.14), ✅ Test (1.13), ✅ Lint, ✅ Test (1.17), ✅ Test (1.16), ✅ Test (1.15), ✅ Test (1.14), ✅ Test (1.13), ✅ Lint
Pull request URL: https://github.com/Khan/genqlient/pull/59
The design doc talks about the zero value for the `string` and `*string` types and then references `0` and `null`. This PR changes these values to `""` and `nil`.
