This enables accessing the Extensions field, as defined in the response
format: https://spec.graphql.org/October2021/#sec-Response-Format
Extensions can be enabled using configuration option use_extensions.
This will change the return parameters of the generated client
functions. Making it a breaking change if enabled.
Since extensions are untyped as defined in the spec, the Client will
return an interface of type map[string]interface{}.
## Summary:
In this commit I refactor the argument-generation logic to move most of
the code out of the template and into the type-generator. This logic
predates #51, and I didn't think to update it there, but I think it
benefits from similar treatment, for similar reasons.
Specifically, the main change is to treat variables as another struct
type we can generate, rather than handling them inline as a
`map[string]interface{}`. Users still pass them the same way, but
instead of putting them into a `map[string]interface{}` and JSONifying
that, we generate a struct and put them there.
This turns out to simplify things quite a lot, because we already have a
lot of code to generate types. Notably, the omitempty code goes from a
dozen lines to basically two, and fixes a bug (#43) in the process,
because now that we have a struct, `json.Marshal` will do our work for
us! (And, once we have syntax for it (#14), we'll be able to handle
field-level omitempty basically for free.) More importantly, it will
simplify custom marshalers (#38, forthcoming) significantly, since we do
all that logic at the containing-struct level, but will need to apply it
to arguments.
It does require two breaking changes:
1. For folks implementing the `graphql.Client` API (rather than just
calling `NewClient`): we now pass them variables as an `interface{}`
rather than a `map[string]interface{}`. For most callers, including
Khan/webapp, this is basically a one-line change to the signature of
their `MakeRequest`, and it should be a lot more future-proof.
2. genqlient's handling of the `omitempty` option has changed to match
that of `encoding/json`, in particular it now never considers structs
"empty". The difference was never intentional (I just didn't realize
that behavior of `encoding/json`); arguably our behavior was more
useful but I think that's outweighed by the value of consistency with
`encoding/json` as well as the simpler and more correct
implementation (fixing #43 is actually quite nontrivial otherwise).
Once we have custom unmarshaler support (#38), users will be able to
map a zero value to JSON null if they wish, which is mostly if not
entirely equivalent for GraphQL's purposes.
Issue: https://github.com/Khan/genqlient/issues/38
Issue: https://github.com/Khan/genqlient/issues/43
## Test plan:
make check
Author: benjaminjkraft
Reviewers: StevenACoffman, dnerdy, aberkan, jvoll, mahtabsabet, MiguelCastillo
Required Reviewers:
Approved By: StevenACoffman, dnerdy
Checks: ✅ Test (1.17), ✅ Test (1.16), ✅ Test (1.15), ✅ Test (1.14), ✅ Lint, ✅ Lint, ✅ Test (1.17), ✅ Test (1.16), ✅ Test (1.15), ✅ Test (1.14)
Pull Request URL: https://github.com/Khan/genqlient/pull/103
## Summary:
genqlient has some code (`imports.go`) dedicated to tracking which
imports we need and avoiding conflicts, as well as converting a
(restricted) Go expression like `map[string]github.com/me/mypkg.MyType`
to an import (`github.com/me/mypkg`) and a type-reference
(`map[string]mypkg.MyType`) to be used in the context of that import,
and at least making some attempt to track conflicts. (Right now the
conflict-avoidance is not very smart, and not very well tested, but it
comes up rarely anyway.) Sadly, that code was a bit cumbersome to use,
because you had to first register the imports (typically from
`convert.go`), then use them (often from the template).
In this commit I refactor the order we write things in order to allow a
significant simplification of how we import; in particular we no longer
have to guess in advance what imports which template will need; it can
just do `{{ref <expr>}}` as before, and it just works. To do this, I:
- changed the importer to have only one API, which adds the import if
needed, and returns the reference either way
- added a check that we don't add imports after they're written
- reorganized the toplevel templates a bit to make sure that check never
fires; we now generate all the types and operations, then write the
imports and glue it all together
This removes a bunch of silly code, and should simplify the process of
adding custom (un)marshalers (#38).
While I was at it, I put the documentation of what expressions we
support in a more visible place, and added a type-assertion that your
custom context type implements context.Context (if applicable).
## Test plan:
make check
Author: benjaminjkraft
Reviewers: StevenACoffman, dnerdy, aberkan, jvoll, mahtabsabet, MiguelCastillo
Required Reviewers:
Approved By: StevenACoffman, dnerdy
Checks: ⌛ Test (1.17), ⌛ Test (1.16), ⌛ Test (1.15), ⌛ Test (1.14), ⌛ Lint, ⌛ Test (1.17), ⌛ Test (1.16), ⌛ Test (1.15), ⌛ Test (1.14), ⌛ Lint
Pull Request URL: https://github.com/Khan/genqlient/pull/101
## Summary:
Steve pointed out (#73) that having genqlient with no arguments silently
use a default config file was a bit confusing, and changed it to use
`genqlient.yaml` by default (#74). Mark pointed out (#76) that this
makes it a bit less convenient when you're starting from scratch; you
have to go create a config file. In this commit I add a new init flag
that creates you a config file before using it.
Originally the suggestion was to use subcommands, e.g. we'd have
`genqlient init` and `genqlient generate` and so on. But I couldn't
think of anything else we might want subcommands for in the future, and
it felt a little silly to make you type `generate` each time. So
instead, I made it a flag, which has the nice property that you can do
`genqlient --init` and it will generate and then use a config file. (I
mean, maybe it will immediately crash because you don't have a schema,
but hopefully that's still a useful clue as to what to do next!) The
implmentation was fairly trivial.
Since we now have a nice way to generate a default config, I removed the
default values for most of the options; I've always felt they were
probably more confusing than helpful. (And indeed, all the users I know
of (Khan/webapp, and the much smaller project Steve was working on, are
setting those options explicitly.) This required a slight change to
the syntax to say "don't use context", which is probably also net clearer.
I decided this is also a good time to pull in a proper CLI parser (#31);
see ADR-504 for more on that choice. This also adds some nice help
messages!
Fixes#76, #31.
Issue: https://github.com/Khan/genqlient/issues/76
## Test plan:
```
go run .
go run . --init
go run . --init example/genqlient.yaml # refuses to clobber
go run . --init example/newgenqlient.yaml
```
Author: benjaminjkraft
Reviewers: dnerdy, aberkan, MiguelCastillo, StevenACoffman
Required Reviewers:
Approved By: dnerdy
Checks: ✅ Test (1.17), ✅ Test (1.16), ✅ Test (1.15), ✅ Test (1.14), ✅ Lint, ✅ Test (1.17), ✅ Test (1.16), ✅ Test (1.15), ✅ Test (1.14), ✅ Lint
Pull Request URL: https://github.com/Khan/genqlient/pull/81
## Summary:
ContextType is in use at Khan as a part of our ka-context system; it
basically just lets you configure the type to pass as the `ctx` argument
to genqlient helpers (or say to omit such an argument). ClientGetter I
wrote thinking we might use it; then we didn't (because we have a few
different clients we may use) but it's not much code and may be helpful
to others. In this commit I clean up, document, and add tests for both
options.
The cleanup is mainly for ClientGetter, which was kind of broken before
because it was a Go snippet but couldn't specify imports. I was
thinking maybe you want to be able to write `ctx.Something()`, but I
just don't see how to make it work, so I made it a function of context,
which is probably the better idea anyway.
Additionally, I improved the documentation for both, and added tests for
those and several other config options that weren't completely tested.
Fixes#5.
Issue: https://github.com/Khan/genqlient/issues/5
## Test plan:
make check
Author: benjaminjkraft
Reviewers: dnerdy, aberkan, MiguelCastillo
Required Reviewers:
Approved By: dnerdy
Checks: ✅ Test (1.17), ✅ Test (1.16), ✅ Test (1.15), ✅ Test (1.14), ✅ Test (1.13), ✅ Lint, ✅ Test (1.17), ✅ Test (1.16), ✅ Test (1.15), ✅ Test (1.14), ✅ Test (1.13), ✅ Lint
Pull Request URL: https://github.com/Khan/genqlient/pull/77
