Project import generated by Copybara.
GitOrigin-RevId: 33adfdf31f3a5cbf9edc07ee1ea583e95080bdc5
This commit is contained in:
@@ -14,17 +14,27 @@ nav_order: 30
|
||||
|
||||
### [Face Detection](https://google.github.io/mediapipe/solutions/face_detection)
|
||||
|
||||
* Face detection model for front-facing/selfie camera:
|
||||
[TFLite model](https://github.com/google/mediapipe/tree/master/mediapipe/modules/face_detection/face_detection_front.tflite),
|
||||
* Short-range model (best for faces within 2 meters from the camera):
|
||||
[TFLite model](https://github.com/google/mediapipe/tree/master/mediapipe/modules/face_detection/face_detection_short_range.tflite),
|
||||
[TFLite model quantized for EdgeTPU/Coral](https://github.com/google/mediapipe/tree/master/mediapipe/examples/coral/models/face-detector-quantized_edgetpu.tflite),
|
||||
[Model card](https://mediapipe.page.link/blazeface-mc)
|
||||
* Face detection model for back-facing camera:
|
||||
[TFLite model](https://github.com/google/mediapipe/tree/master/mediapipe/modules/face_detection/face_detection_back.tflite),
|
||||
* Full-range model (dense, best for faces within 5 meters from the camera):
|
||||
[TFLite model](https://github.com/google/mediapipe/tree/master/mediapipe/modules/face_detection/face_detection_full_range.tflite),
|
||||
[Model card](https://mediapipe.page.link/blazeface-back-mc)
|
||||
* Face detection model for back-facing camera (sparse):
|
||||
[TFLite model](https://github.com/google/mediapipe/tree/master/mediapipe/modules/face_detection/face_detection_back_sparse.tflite),
|
||||
* Full-range model (sparse, best for faces within 5 meters from the camera):
|
||||
[TFLite model](https://github.com/google/mediapipe/tree/master/mediapipe/modules/face_detection/face_detection_full_range_sparse.tflite),
|
||||
[Model card](https://mediapipe.page.link/blazeface-back-sparse-mc)
|
||||
|
||||
Full-range dense and sparse models have the same quality in terms of
|
||||
[F-score](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-score) however differ in underlying
|
||||
metrics. The dense model is slightly better in
|
||||
[Recall](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precision_and_recall) whereas the sparse
|
||||
model outperforms the dense one in
|
||||
[Precision](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Precision_and_recall). Speed-wise
|
||||
sparse model is ~30% faster when executing on CPU via
|
||||
[XNNPACK](https://github.com/google/XNNPACK) whereas on GPU the models
|
||||
demonstrate comparable latencies. Depending on your application, you may prefer
|
||||
one over the other.
|
||||
|
||||
### [Face Mesh](https://google.github.io/mediapipe/solutions/face_mesh)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user