700392315a
## Summary: It would be nice to have some linting beyond `go vet`! Now we do. I started by copying the config from Khan/webapp. I did remove a couple of staticcheck checks that I didn't feel were useful. (Note also that exportloopref is the replacement for scopelint in newer golangci-lint.) Included are all the needed lint fixes; most are stylistic but the changes in the example are a (minor) bugfix. Fixes #22. Issue: https://github.com/Khan/genqlient/issues/22 ## Test plan: make check Author: benjaminjkraft Reviewers: aberkan, dnerdy, benjaminjkraft, csilvers, MiguelCastillo Required Reviewers: Approved by: aberkan, dnerdy Checks: ✅ Test (1.17), ✅ Test (1.16), ✅ Test (1.15), ✅ Test (1.14), ✅ Test (1.13), ✅ Lint, ✅ Test (1.17), ✅ Test (1.16), ✅ Test (1.15), ✅ Test (1.14), ✅ Test (1.13), ✅ Lint Pull request URL: https://github.com/Khan/genqlient/pull/49
14 lines
434 B
Go
14 lines
434 B
Go
// Conventionally this sort of thing would use the "ignore" tag, but
|
|
// `go mod tidy` ignores so-tagged files explicitly, so we use another build
|
|
// tag we never intend to set.
|
|
// +build tools
|
|
//go:build tools
|
|
|
|
package testutil
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
// Keep golangci-lint from getting pruned from the go.mod. We need it in
|
|
// go.mod so that we can easily `go run` it in `make check`.
|
|
_ "github.com/golangci/golangci-lint/cmd/golangci-lint"
|
|
)
|