Files
genqlient/internal/integration/schema.graphql
T
Ben Kraft 5995653583 Refactor argument-handling to use a struct (#103)
## Summary:
In this commit I refactor the argument-generation logic to move most of
the code out of the template and into the type-generator.  This logic
predates #51, and I didn't think to update it there, but I think it
benefits from similar treatment, for similar reasons.

Specifically, the main change is to treat variables as another struct
type we can generate, rather than handling them inline as a
`map[string]interface{}`.  Users still pass them the same way, but
instead of putting them into a `map[string]interface{}` and JSONifying
that, we generate a struct and put them there.

This turns out to simplify things quite a lot, because we already have a
lot of code to generate types.  Notably, the omitempty code goes from a
dozen lines to basically two, and fixes a bug (#43) in the process,
because now that we have a struct, `json.Marshal` will do our work for
us! (And, once we have syntax for it (#14), we'll be able to handle
field-level omitempty basically for free.)  More importantly, it will
simplify custom marshalers (#38, forthcoming) significantly, since we do
all that logic at the containing-struct level, but will need to apply it
to arguments.

It does require two breaking changes:

1. For folks implementing the `graphql.Client` API (rather than just
   calling `NewClient`): we now pass them variables as an `interface{}`
   rather than a `map[string]interface{}`.  For most callers, including
   Khan/webapp, this is basically a one-line change to the signature of
   their `MakeRequest`, and it should be a lot more future-proof.
2. genqlient's handling of the `omitempty` option has changed to match
   that of `encoding/json`, in particular it now never considers structs
   "empty".  The difference was never intentional (I just didn't realize
   that behavior of `encoding/json`); arguably our behavior was more
   useful but I think that's outweighed by the value of consistency with
   `encoding/json` as well as the simpler and more correct
   implementation (fixing #43 is actually quite nontrivial otherwise).
   Once we have custom unmarshaler support (#38), users will be able to
   map a zero value to JSON null if they wish, which is mostly if not
   entirely equivalent for GraphQL's purposes.

Issue: https://github.com/Khan/genqlient/issues/38
Issue: https://github.com/Khan/genqlient/issues/43

## Test plan:
make check

Author: benjaminjkraft

Reviewers: StevenACoffman, dnerdy, aberkan, jvoll, mahtabsabet, MiguelCastillo

Required Reviewers: 

Approved By: StevenACoffman, dnerdy

Checks:  Test (1.17),  Test (1.16),  Test (1.15),  Test (1.14),  Lint,  Lint,  Test (1.17),  Test (1.16),  Test (1.15),  Test (1.14)

Pull Request URL: https://github.com/Khan/genqlient/pull/103
2021-09-22 17:16:36 -07:00

42 lines
650 B
GraphQL

type Query {
me: User
user(id: ID): User
being(id: ID!): Being
beings(ids: [ID!]!): [Being]!
lotteryWinner(number: Int!): Lucky
fail: Boolean
}
type User implements Being & Lucky {
id: ID!
name: String!
luckyNumber: Int
hair: Hair
}
type Hair { color: String } # silly name to confuse the name-generator
type Animal implements Being {
id: ID!
name: String!
species: Species!
owner: Being
hair: BeingsHair
}
type BeingsHair { hasHair: Boolean! } # silly name to confuse the name-generator
enum Species {
DOG
COELACANTH
}
interface Being {
id: ID!
name: String!
}
interface Lucky {
luckyNumber: Int
}