Update README.md
Add question about webrtc.rs
This commit is contained in:
@@ -116,6 +116,13 @@ Yes. We chose Rust over C++ for a few reasons:
|
||||
- Rust has a rich ecosystem of tools (e.g. websockets, async executor).
|
||||
- Having the WebAssembly target will be useful down the road, C++ has Emscripten but it's a bit harder to set up and doesn't yet have WebRTC support.
|
||||
|
||||
### Did you look at Arcas for libwebrtc bindings?
|
||||
### Did you look at [Arcas](https://github.com/arcas-io/libwebrtc) for libwebrtc bindings?
|
||||
|
||||
Yes. Our build system is inspired by LBL's work! Given that some of our logic (e.g. hardware decoder code) is in C++ and that we may need to bridge more/different things than Arcas, we decided it was better to have our own bindings for full control.
|
||||
|
||||
### Did you consider using [webrtc.rs](https://webrtc.rs/) instead of libwebrtc?
|
||||
Yes! As webrtc.rs matures, we'll eventually migrate to a pure Rust stack. For now, we chose libwebrtc for a few reasons:
|
||||
|
||||
- Chrome's adoption and usage means libwebrtc is thoroughly battle-tested.
|
||||
- webrtc.rs is ported from Pion (which [our SFU](https://github.com/livekit/livekit) is built on) and a better fit for server-side use.
|
||||
- libwebrtc currently supports more features like encoding/decoding and includes platform-specific code for dealing with media devices.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user